This Stage used 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese artificial intelligence business that establishes open-source large language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the company in 2023 and serves as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 design offers reactions similar to other contemporary big language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a substantially lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were established amidst United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were intended to restrict the capability of these two countries to develop sophisticated AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its very first totally free chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 design, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had gone beyond ChatGPT as the most-downloaded free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share cost to visit 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against bigger and more recognized rivals has actually been referred to as “overthrowing AI”, [8] constituting “the first chance at what is emerging as a global AI space race”, [11] and introducing “a brand-new period of AI brinkmanship”. [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative artificial intelligence algorithms, designs, and training details open-source, permitting its code to be easily offered for usage, adjustment, watching, and designing documents for building functions. [13] The company reportedly strongly hires young AI researchers from top Chinese universities, [8] and employs from outside the computer system science field to diversify its designs’ understanding and abilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading considering that the 2007-2008 financial crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer exclusively used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has actually made its generative expert system chatbot open source, indicating its code is easily available for usage, modification, and viewing. This includes consent to access and utilize the source code, as well as style documents, for developing functions. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had developed a shop of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip restrictions on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started an artificial general intelligence laboratory dedicated to research developing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s monetary company. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the laboratory became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital companies were unwilling in offering funding as it was not likely that it would be able to produce an exit in a brief amount of time. [15]

After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which offered strong efficiency for a low cost, DeepSeek ended up being called the driver for China’s AI design rate war. It was rapidly called the “Pinduoduo of AI”, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the rate of their AI designs to contend with the business. Despite the low price charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its competitors that were losing cash. [20]

DeepSeek is focused on research study and has no comprehensive strategies for commercialization; [20] this also allows its technology to avoid the most stringent provisions of China’s AI policies, such as needing consumer-facing innovation to adhere to the federal government’s controls on information. [3]

DeepSeek’s employing preferences target technical capabilities rather than work experience, resulting in many new hires being either recent university graduates or developers whose AI careers are less developed. [18] [3] Likewise, the company recruits individuals without any computer technology background to help its technology understand other subjects and understanding areas, including being able to produce poetry and perform well on the infamously hard Chinese college admissions tests (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its very first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is readily available totally free to both researchers and business users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license arrangement (“DeepSeek license”) regarding “open and responsible downstream usage” for the design itself. [21]

They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series consists of 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of guideline data. This produced the Instruct models.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, connected by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B criteria in both Base and Chat types (no Instruct was released). It was established to complete with other LLMs readily available at the time. The paper declared benchmark results higher than a lot of open source LLMs at the time, specifically Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]

The architecture was basically the like those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text obtained by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat versions of the 2 Base designs was also released simultaneously, gotten by training Base by supervised finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B criteria (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the very same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed equivalent efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variant of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared professionals” that are constantly queried, and “routed experts” that might not be. They discovered this to assist with professional balancing. In basic MoE, some experts can become excessively depended on, while other professionals may be rarely used, losing specifications. Attempting to stabilize the specialists so that they are similarly used then causes professionals to duplicate the exact same capacity. They proposed the shared specialists to find out core capacities that are often used, and let the routed specialists to find out the peripheral capabilities that are hardly ever used. [28]

In April 2024, they released 3 DeepSeek-Math models specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math problems and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step services. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The benefit model was a procedure reward model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd approach. [30] This benefit model was then used to train Instruct utilizing group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics questions “related to GSM8K and MATH”. The reward model was continuously updated during training to avoid reward hacking. This led to the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 designs, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 larger models were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not released.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in 2 phases. The very first stage was trained to fix math and coding issues. This stage used 1 benefit design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The second stage was trained to be valuable, safe, and follow rules. This stage used 3 benefit designs. The helpfulness and security reward designs were trained on human choice information. The rule-based benefit design was by hand programmed. All experienced reward models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the released version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They selected 2-staged RL, because they discovered that RL on reasoning data had “special qualities” various from RL on basic data. For example, RL on reasoning could improve over more training steps. [31]

The two V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and qualified similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite version to assist “additional research study and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]

Architecturally, the V2 models were significantly modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the standard attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and utilized the mix of specialists (MoE) alternative previously released in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they released 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to produce 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction data, then integrated with a direction dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for mathematics problems was calculated by comparing to the ground-truth label. The reward for code issues was produced by a benefit design trained to forecast whether a program would pass the system tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was launched in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is essentially the like V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mostly English and Chinese. It contained a greater ratio of mathematics and programs than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of thinking (math, programming, logic) and non-reasoning (innovative writing, roleplay, basic question answering) data. Reasoning data was generated by “skilled designs”. Non-reasoning data was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and inspected by humans. – The “expert models” were trained by starting with an undefined base model, then SFT on both information, and synthetic information produced by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system prompt asked the R1 to reflect and verify during thinking. Then the expert models were RL using an unspecified benefit function.
– Each expert design was trained to generate simply artificial reasoning data in one particular domain (mathematics, programming, logic).
– Expert models were utilized, instead of R1 itself, considering that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor formatting, and extreme length”.

4. Model-based benefit models were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human preference data consisting of both last benefit and chain-of-thought causing the final reward. The reward model produced benefit signals for both questions with unbiased but free-form responses, and concerns without objective responses (such as creative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO utilizing both benefit models and rule-based benefit. The rule-based reward was computed for mathematics issues with a final response (put in a box), and for shows problems by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek team carried out substantial low-level engineering to achieve efficiency. They used mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the standard 32-bit, needing unique GEMM regimens to accumulate properly. They utilized a custom-made 12-bit float (E5M6) for only the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They lessened the communication latency by overlapping thoroughly computation and interaction, such as committing 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU communication. They decreased interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise maker each professional was on in order to prevent particular machines being queried more frequently than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing strategies. [37]

After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 surpassed Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1 became available by means of DeepSeek’s API, as well as by means of a chat user interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for rational inference, mathematical thinking, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek claimed that it went beyond performance of OpenAI o1 on benchmarks such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it utilized 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 design reached an option faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company also launched some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial information generated by R1. [47]

A discussion in between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant resolves it. The assistant first considers the reasoning process in the mind and then offers the user with the answer. The reasoning procedure and answer are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking process here respond to here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they used no model-based benefit. All reward functions were rule-based, “mainly” of two types (other types were not defined): accuracy rewards and format rewards. Accuracy benefit was examining whether a boxed response is correct (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format reward was checking whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has problems with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to address these issues and additional improve reasoning: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the same RL process as R1-Zero, however likewise with a “language consistency reward” to motivate it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not released.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning data from the internal model, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the generated thinking had a wrong final answer, then it is gotten rid of). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, factual QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial data for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for thinking tasks) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K information synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable way as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and reactions

DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly responds to questions, resolves reasoning issues and writes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests used by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 utilizes substantially fewer resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI companies train their chatbots with supercomputers utilizing as many as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to have actually needed only about 2,000 GPUs, particularly the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta invested developing its latest AI technology. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at relatively very little cost has actually been acknowledged as potentially challenging the worldwide dominance of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 design was reportedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s most current designs when utilized for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language thinking; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen likewise explained R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]

DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media commonly applauded DeepSeek as a national asset. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his seminar with professionals and asked him to provide opinions and tips on a draft for remarks of the yearly 2024 federal government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of restricted resources has highlighted potential limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, that include export constraints on innovative AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI models subsequently “stimulated market chaos” [57] and caused shares in significant international technology companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech companies likewise sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, triggered by the release of the R1 design, had resulted in tape losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of value was rubbed out American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined responses to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “very remarkable”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed suspicion of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to utilize the design in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek limited its new user registration to contact number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a “large-scale” cyberattack interfered with the appropriate performance of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have actually observed that the main application programming interface (API) version of R1, which runs from servers located in China, utilizes censorship systems for subjects that are thought about politically sensitive for the federal government of China. For example, the design refuses to address concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might at first produce an answer, however then deletes it quickly later on and changes it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my existing scope. Let’s discuss something else.” [72] The integrated censorship systems and limitations can only be removed to a limited level in the open-source version of the R1 model. If the “core socialist values” defined by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are terminated. [74] When checked by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and mentioned: “We securely oppose any kind of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are dedicated to accomplishing the complete reunification of the motherland through serene ways.” [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the ability to fool DeepSeek into providing certain answers to a few of these subjects by requesting in its response to swap certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some specialists fear that the federal government of China could use the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading disinformation, surveillance and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy terms and conditions state “We keep the info we gather in secure servers located in the People’s Republic of China … We might collect your text or audio input, timely, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you provide to our model and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy is constant with ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security concerns. [80] In reaction, the Italian data security authority is looking for extra information on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of personal data, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had actually begun a national security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s government prohibited using DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a query into DeepSeek’s usage of individual details. [83]

Expert system market in China.

Notes

^ a b c The variety of heads does not equal the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required picking “Deep Think enabled”, and every user could use it just 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s cheap, open AI design DeepSeek thrills researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world prepared to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s less expensive designs and weaker chips bring into question trillions in AI infrastructure spending”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might hit India’s AI ambitions”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia investigation signals widening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you ought to understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares tumble as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a leading Chinese AI model overcame US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the original on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the original on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design surpasses Meta, OpenAI items”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, surpasses Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model seems among the very best ‘open’ oppositions yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: letting loose supercharged thinking power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s very first thinking design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI startup DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has reached its Sputnik minute”. The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn cleaned off US stocks after Chinese firm reveals AI chatbot” – through The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek positions an obstacle to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI design development highlights limits of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot stimulates US market chaos, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek stimulates worldwide AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “incredibly outstanding”: “We must take the advancements out of China really, extremely seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek design ‘excellent'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement “positive””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – through NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s disturbance”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests enormous Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS consumers, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek hit with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app shops”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek briefly limited brand-new sign-ups, mentioning ‘massive destructive attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it doesn’t appreciate totally free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We tried out DeepSeek. It worked well, until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on an international AI race: geopolitics, development and the rise of mayhem”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek shocks Silicon Valley, offering the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI poses formidable cyber, data personal privacy threats”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts urge caution over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a substantial TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on information defense”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House examines effect of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, authorities says”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.