Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: adremcareers.com Federal workers have up until February 6 to decide whether to voluntarily leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to take leave and be paid until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work attorney who represents federal employees as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM’s delayed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really don’t consider it so much a deal. I believe it’s a demand to resign with a vague promise that, possibly, you could be kept in administrative leave status for as much as eight months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is due to the fact that there appears to be the deal of administrative leave for as much as 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never explain it as a buyout. I believe that’s an extremely deceptive term to utilize in this scenario. When you think of a buyout, there’s usually some sort of composed agreement or a concrete deal to provide an advantage in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your recommendations, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is exercise severe care. There are no guarantees contained in this e-mail. The only thing I can tell you for particular is that if you change your mind, the firm’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of employee who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most mindful because leaving earlier than planned can have serious consequences, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is a bargain for people who don’t desire to go back to the workplace. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is an idea to that they need to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the choice to resign, and this administration is really generously providing to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just – in such a way, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s created to get folks who work actually tough to resign. I believe it’s trying to pull the wool over a great deal of people’s eyes since there are no warranties. And these are individuals who love their job. They love the mission of the agency. They strive. And right now, they’re dealing with extremely hard choices, particularly if they’re remote. I mean, it’s really coercive.MARTIN: You say it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who lives in Oregon and referall.us has been informed to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal obstacles just to the offer itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be sincere, is so unprecedented that I think a great deal of us are still trying to figure out what to do with it. I’m uncertain if the offer itself might be challengeable. I believe the larger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not mindful of any authority that exists today for OPM to order companies to give this variety of individuals administrative leave. So I think it is very much possibly setting the phase for challenges since I feel OPM has significantly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, somalibidders.com D.C. Thank you a lot for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our site regards to use and approvals pages at www.npr.org for further info.

NPR records are produced on a rush deadline by an NPR specialist. This text might not remain in its final form and might be updated or modified in the future. Accuracy and availability might vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.